Monday, September 19, 2016
Drawing Thinking
Thinking is making note of connections between things in the
mind, the confluence of memories and observation. We draw links, draw up plans,
draw conclusions. The prevalence of the drawing metaphor in speaking suggests a
deep level understanding of the visual understructure to thinking. The look of
the whole, with all the interrelated patterns that flow through it are
structure. Drawing puts emphasis on the qualities and association that caught
attention and not the label and category. It brings out the value of the
subject for the individual and not generalities about it. The brilliant
psychiatrist Alfred Adler thought having art around was important to every child’s
education because it was teaching values.
Beyond developing
a relationship with reality drawing is a way of mapping the relationships in
ideas. Most visual thinking happens in our minds as we live and react to what’s
going on around us. Built on the understanding of what to expect from spatial
structure, may scientists use drawing to work out relationships and influences.
Recently I was looking at Michael’s Faraday’s drawings of magnetic fields at a
time when no one had any insight into them. He observed magnetic filings and
did drawings that look very much like some of the energy fields in paintings by
Alex Grey. Core structures turn up in many different realms. The effort to
understand consciousness needs images to encompass to scope of such a big concept.
Science long used the idea of elegance, the rightness of an idea felt in its
beauty. Paying attention to beauty in a whole scene frees us from the tyranny
in the separateness of things and trains insight into what matters. It unifies
what language divides. Our innate sense of harmony tells us what fits and what
doesn’t. Drawing both develops and utilizes visual sensitivity.
Even doodles show
what kind of rhythms and relations are interesting. Most doodles have a fractal
order that depends on the motion of the whole for its implications. Vary the
size of the elements as you doodle and let the fractal beauty emerge. Denis
Dutton in his book “The Art Instinct” suggests that humans have an innate feel
for beauty. Nobel prize winning scientist David Bohm called it a sense of what
fits. Since so much of our conceptual language depends on comparison to
physical spatial relationships like ‘more’, ‘where’ and ‘which’, finding a
particular way of drawing that maps personal thought and preference could
extend conceptual ability. Because art has been marginalized, treated as
something to be done and appreciated by a few, everyone has been denied the
development of mental power that comes from conscious use of whole picture
thinking.
For me drawings are a way to pose philosophical questions.
There is not a verbalized idea but an effort to integrate different worldviews
that requires an overarching integration of perspectives. Visual philosophy
begins with reflecting on this enlarged big picture and paring it down so some
new aspect of the structure shows. Commonality is there in the universal
actions of living which we translate into concepts. Using art to become more
sensitive to the messages in the look of things is available to everyone
whether looking or doing. Just because your school art teacher didn’t like what
you did doesn’t mean you can’t draw.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)